Georgia Premises Liability: New Risks for 2026

Listen to this article · 11 min listen

Key Takeaways

  • In Ga. CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. Taber (2025), the Georgia Court of Appeals said property owners have to protect people from foreseeable crime, even if nothing exactly like it has happened there before.
  • To figure out what’s “foreseeable,” you can’t just look at your own incident reports anymore. You have to consider crime in the whole neighborhood and any upward trends.
  • Businesses need a real risk strategy: security audits, better lighting, security guards people can see, and modern cameras are a must to fight assault claims.
  • If you can’t prove you took reasonable security steps under this new, broader standard, you’re looking at a huge financial hit in a Georgia court.
  • It’s time to get your lawyer to review your security plans and your insurance policies for all your commercial properties to make sure you’re covered under this new standard of care.

If you’re a property owner in Georgia, the rules for premises liability assault cases just changed, big time. The Georgia Court of Appeals decision in Ga. CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. Taber (2025) completely resets what’s expected of you when it comes to protecting people from crime. It forces a much bigger, more active approach to figuring out what’s “foreseeable.” So what does this mean for your business or the land you own?

The Taber Decision: Broadening the Scope of Foreseeability

The Taber ruling blows up the old way of looking at O.C.G.A. Section 51-3-1. For years, the courts in Georgia had a pretty rigid rule: to hold a property owner liable for an assault, you usually had to show a “substantially similar” crime had happened on their property before. This gave owners a lot of cover. If they’d only had shoplifting, they could argue they couldn’t possibly have foreseen a violent carjacking, and plaintiffs often lost these cases. The Taber case was a perfect example. A person was assaulted in a CVS parking lot where there had been break-ins and shoplifting, but no prior violent attacks. The trial court sided with CVS, throwing the case out because the past crimes weren’t “substantially similar.” The Georgia Court of Appeals said, “Not so fast.” They reversed it, saying that you don’t need a carbon copy of a past crime to make a future one foreseeable. They introduced a “totality of the circumstances” approach. This means you, the property owner, have to look at everything: the crimes on your specific property, sure, but also the general vibe of the neighborhood, rising crime stats from the local cops, and the whole security picture. The court put it plainly: “a property owner can’t turn a blind eye to a deteriorating security situation simply because no prior assault matched the exact circumstances of the plaintiff’s attack.” That one sentence is a wake-up call for any business in an area with any level of crime.

Who is Affected by This Change?

So, who needs to worry about this? Pretty much every property owner in Georgia who has people over. If you’re a commercial landlord, run a retail store, own an apartment building, a hotel, or a parking garage, you’re on the hook. Basically, if you invite people onto your property, your duty of care just got a lot heavier, and you have to rethink your entire security setup. Think about businesses on Atlanta’s busy Peachtree Street or in the big shopping areas like Lenox Square and Perimeter Mall. They’re obvious targets. But it’s not the high-traffic spots alone. Let’s say you own a shopping center in a “safe” suburb like Alpharetta that has a clean record. If the police in that area start reporting a spike in robberies or carjackings nearby, that’s now *your* problem from a legal standpoint when it comes to your parking lot’s security. You’re expected to know about it and react. It’s not enough to just look at your own four walls anymore. If you’re a property manager with sites all over the state, you can’t just check the incident log for each address. You need to be pulling crime data for the entire zip code or police zone, constantly, to show you’re on top of the “totality of the circumstances.”

Concrete Steps Property Owners Should Take Now

With this new standard in place, you need to act now to protect yourself from personal injury claims after a third-party assault.

Review and Update Security Assessments

You need to get regular, serious security assessments of your property. That means hiring an actual security expert to come in and look at what you have (and what you don’t) through the lens of this new *Taber* standard. This isn’t a checklist you can download. Your expert needs to dig into your property’s weak spots, the poorly lit entrances, the blind corners in the parking garage, how visible your guards are, and whether your cameras are actually catching anything useful, and then give you a concrete plan, like upgrading to HD cameras or adding another guard during closing time.

Enhance Lighting and Visibility

Dark corners are a plaintiff’s attorney’s best friend. Go out and walk your property at night. Are the parking lots, walkways, and entrances lit up like a ballpark? They should be. Motion-sensor lights are a good, cheap addition for areas that don’t get much foot traffic. The goal is simple: make it impossible for someone to hide. A bright, clean environment sends a message that you’re paying attention, which is often enough to make a criminal go somewhere else.

Implement and Monitor Surveillance Systems

Old, grainy CCTV isn’t going to cut it anymore. You need high-quality, modern cameras that cover all the vulnerable spots. More importantly, someone needs to be responsible for them. Are they being monitored in real time? If not, are you keeping the recordings for a decent length of time? A broken camera or a full hard drive is as good as no camera at all in a lawsuit. A jury will want to know if your system was actually functional.

Increase Visible Security Presence

Seeing a security guard in a uniform is a powerful deterrent. For properties in higher-risk areas or with a past history of problems, hiring professional security is a no-brainer. For smaller shops, it could be as simple as training your employees to be visible, aware, and to report anything that seems off. The point is visibility. A simple sign that says “24-Hour Video Surveillance” can do a lot of heavy lifting.

Engage with Local Law Enforcement

Get to know your local police precinct. Don’t wait for something bad to happen. Call them and ask for crime stats for your area. Talk to them about trends they’re seeing. This shows a jury you’re being proactive. Plus, they might give you some free and very valuable advice on security. If your property is in Midtown Atlanta, for example, having a documented conversation with the Atlanta Police Department’s Zone 5 precinct about local crime patterns is an incredibly smart move.

Review and Update Lease Agreements

Landlords should dust off their lease agreements. You need to be crystal clear about tenant responsibilities for security and reporting incidents. You can’t just pass off your own legal duties, but you can create a community expectation of vigilance. This could be clauses about reporting suspicious activity or rules about who they can have on the property.

Insurance Coverage Review

Last, call your insurance broker or lawyer and go over your liability policy line by line. Make sure your coverage is actually sufficient for a major third-party crime claim under this new, wider standard. You need to know exactly what your policy says about criminal acts and what your limits are before you ever need to use it.

The Nuances of “Totality of the Circumstances”

The “totality of the circumstances” standard is tricky because it’s so broad. It means a jury is going to be looking at a much wider set of facts. For instance, if your business is next door to a known trouble spot, a jury might decide you should have taken extra precautions, even if your own property has been quiet. What a court wants to know is whether a reasonable person, running your business, would have seen the potential for an attack and done something to prevent it. This is where cases are won and lost. You’ll see a battle of security experts on the stand, arguing over crime data analysis, industry standards, and whether your lighting was bright enough. As a defense lawyer, you can’t just point to a clean incident log anymore. You have to build a case that shows your client was actively monitoring every possible risk factor, from the county-wide crime stats down to the burned-out bulb in the back alley. A property owner in Fulton County, for example, can’t claim ignorance about a rise in parking lot assaults across the county just because their specific lot in Sandy Springs was incident-free. That county-level data is now part of the “totality” they’re responsible for knowing.

The Cost of Inaction

If you fail to get with this new program, the consequences are brutal. A successful premises liability assault lawsuit will bury you in damages, medical bills, lost income, pain and suffering, and maybe even punitive damages designed to punish you. That kind of financial hit can easily bankrupt a small business. And the money is only part of it. When a violent crime happens at your business, your reputation is shot. Customers, tenants, and even your own employees will be afraid to come back, which can create a death spiral for your operations. The money you spend on good, proactive security is an investment that’s a whole lot cheaper than paying to defend a lawsuit and then paying the verdict. The courts in Georgia have sent a clear signal with the *Taber* case: looking out for the people you invite onto your property isn’t optional, and the old excuses won’t work anymore. You need to be vigilant, constantly assessing your risks, and committed to security. These are now legal requirements.

Conclusion

The 2025 ruling in Ga. CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. Taber has changed the game for foreseeability in Georgia premises liability. Property owners can’t just react anymore. They have to be proactive. You must now look at the big picture, including crime trends in the surrounding area, when you’re assessing risk. Get your property audited, beef up your visible security, and talk to the local police. It’s the only way to effectively limit your legal risk.

What’s premises liability for assault?

Premises liability for assault means a property owner can be held legally and financially responsible when someone is injured by a criminal act (like an assault) on their property. This liability kicks in if the owner was negligent in protecting their guests from a crime that was considered foreseeable.

How did the Taber decision change premises liability law in Georgia?

The *Taber* case in 2025 radically expanded what “foreseeable” means in Georgia. Before, courts usually wanted proof of a very similar crime happening on the same property. Now, after *Ga. CVS Pharmacy, LLC v. Taber*, owners have to consider the “totality of the circumstances.” This includes crime trends in the entire neighborhood and the general security situation, not just their own incident log.

What specific Georgia statute governs premises liability?

The main law is O.C.G.A. Section 51-3-1. It says that if you invite people onto your land for a lawful reason, you’re on the hook for damages if they get hurt because you failed to use “ordinary care” to keep the property and its approaches safe.

What should a property owner do to reduce liability for assault?

To protect yourself, you need to get regular security audits, improve the lighting everywhere, install and check your surveillance cameras, and have a visible security presence. You should also be talking to local police about crime trends and have your lawyer review your insurance to make sure it’s adequate for this new standard.

Can a property owner be liable for an assault if no crime ever happened on their property before?

Yes. That’s the big takeaway from the *Taber* decision. Under the new “totality of the circumstances” standard, you can be found liable even with a spotless incident record. If the area around your property has a growing crime problem or other factors would make a reasonable person anticipate risk, a court could decide you were negligent for not taking security measures.

Gary Ellis

Senior Counsel, Municipal Finance J.D., University of Virginia School of Law

Gary Ellis is a distinguished Senior Counsel at Commonwealth Legal Solutions, specializing in municipal finance and infrastructure development law. With 14 years of experience, she advises state and local governments on complex bond issuances, public-private partnerships, and regulatory compliance. Her expertise ensures robust legal frameworks for essential community projects. Ellis is the author of the seminal article, "Navigating Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Revitalization," published in the Journal of State & Local Government Law